Sunday, May 29, 2011

prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short

prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • Squonk
    Jan 10, 11:15 AM
    How about The Beatles finally on iTunes?
    HD Movies in iTunes!
    :apple:TV update for HD content, movie rentals and (((5.1 Dolby Surround Sound)))





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. black prom updo hairstyles
  • black prom updo hairstyles



  • DaveTheGrey
    Jan 5, 04:28 PM
    guys don't forget also to quit your chat aps.

    imagine:
    u wait 3 hours for the stream and then...
    an ichat message pops up...
    "Hi buddy. I just went down to the apple store and now I'm writing to you with my new iPhone. Yeah.
    Wanna come over and check it out?"
    :D


    Dave





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. 2009 2010 2011 hairstyle short
  • 2009 2010 2011 hairstyle short



  • ten-oak-druid
    May 2, 12:31 PM
    The whole thing was blown out of proportion, they had no choice but do somthing thing...

    Well I'm sure Steve Jobs could trot out the explanations given here and point out it is nothing right?

    Email him the argument that this is nothing and blown all out of proportion. He might have a news conference.

    I hate this because it feels like I am ridiculing Steve Jobs like the trolls that come on here. I am not. The world simply isn't black and white. And that is more the case with corporations than individuals.





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. short hair updos for prom 2011
  • short hair updos for prom 2011



  • AppliedVisual
    Oct 17, 09:11 PM
    I have one word for you Lossless.

    Yeah, already work that way... I already have all my audio collection on a centralized music server. I wouldn't mind an iPod for what it is, but I'm also not the kind of guy that enjoys listening to music through cheesy little earbuds. I can do larger DJ-style headphones in a pinch, but I prefer to listen to my music loud on a good sound system where I can feel it. And if anyone else there doesn't like it, they can just leave. :D

    However, I'd like to get back into developing games for a commercial platform and I'd be all over the iPod if Apple would open up an SDK.



    more...


    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • SMM
    Jan 12, 07:09 PM
    I consider your post to spot on! I'm a Mac owner, but I must confess that I find most of my PC-owning friends to be refreshingly free of the type of smug, sycophantic, elitism some Mac people can't help but exhibit. Many PC owners I know wouldn't even recognize Steve Jobs, Steve Ballmer, etc. if they were introduced to them in the street.

    Their sole concern is with having the best computer they can get for their individual needs, the software they can run, etc., not hero worship. Period. Some of them rate Macs quite highly. However, their view tends to be that, unless they're able to afford pro models, they're somewhat compelled to buy PCs because of graphical deficiencies in most consumer Macs.

    Steve Jobs has achieved many great things & for that he surely deserves considerable respect. Some may consider him to be a genius. But if he's a genius, surely, like many other so-called geniuses, it's very likely that he's a flawed one. I don't mean flawed personally; after all, how would I know without knowing him? I mean it in the sense that the direction that he appears to be taking Apple in isn't, IMO (& that of many others), necessarily the best one.

    That's just an opinion. I think that those who think that SJ & Apple are beyond criticism merely confirm the excellent points you've raised in your post.

    Actually, I find your post to be spot off. I find your portrayal of Mac owners to be shallow, self-serving, stereotyping and weak. I did notice you used the term 'some' in an attempt to mitigate your attack.

    The fact is, of the 50-100 Mac users I know, I only know one other person who reads these boards. The majority are just owner/users who love their machines. If I were to pick a group of smug zealots around here, it would be the the Apple bashers.

    I expected the trolls to come flying out of the woodwork after Tuesday. You are living up to all my expectations.





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. Formal, prom, updo hairstyles
  • Formal, prom, updo hairstyles



  • Ugg
    May 5, 08:43 PM
    The OP is an example of just how far from reality the "gun debate" in this country has strayed.

    OP or OPer?



    more...


    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011.
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011.



  • JohnnyQuest
    Mar 17, 01:15 AM
    Haaaaaaa just shared a launch day story, and the majority of you would have hauled ass with iPad in hand for the price I paid. Haters lmfao

    I must say, terrific use of grammar. Flawless.

    You are so delusional. Not everyone lacks morals. What you did is WRONG, and you're trying to justify your actions. The poor guy you STOLE from is most likely going to lose his job. Bravo, you're a huge ass.





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • spillproof
    Oct 6, 12:29 PM
    Getting back to the actual advertisement. What self-respecting advertising professional would use someone else's tagline like that.

    I had a few friends watching the football game (where we saw the ad) and half of them thought it was an iphone commercial because they were only half paying attention and heard "there's a map for that".

    Pretty shoddy work in my opinion.

    I disagree. It is a satirical and pokes fun of AT&T and Apple while giving facts. It gets you to think, which is the goal of an advertisement.

    I like this commercial and hope it makes AT&T a little more scared that they are failing. (Or I could be bias for my love of satires and dislike for AT&T :cool:)

    I think first Verizon has to back a truck full of money up to Apple's campus, then Apple has to build a CDMA iPhone :D

    Just one?



    more...


    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles
  • prom updo hairstyles



  • twoodcc
    Aug 17, 06:55 PM
    Hmm, I have a machine with 3 cards and one of them runs at 90c while the others run at 70+. the other machine with 3 cards all run at 70c

    at least that is runable. my system will crash once the one card gets to 104-105C

    That is weird :confused:

    yeah it is. i've closed the case, but it's still laying down





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • Lesser Evets
    May 4, 06:42 AM
    I just hope the OS doesn't begin to clutter up like OSX began to do after a couple years.

    The iPad is the future, no doubt. A little more capability, speed, and memory, and it's excellent as a home computer.



    more...


    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011



  • JadedBen
    Apr 16, 05:07 AM
    I want My next iPhone to look like this,

    222383



    Also agreed. If they make that (with or without the black strip) i would buy one in a heartbeat.. plus i wouldn't have to buy another iPhone in years as i can't see how they could improve on a physical design like that imho.

    Although i'd probably have to upgrade in 2013 when they drop the software support for it..





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. short hairstyles 2011 for
  • short hairstyles 2011 for



  • mw360
    Apr 6, 10:05 AM
    I see your point, but I think that it's quite uncharitable to question the motives of individuals but let apple have a pass. They are in the position to do whatever they want, and there's no way that they WOULD reimburse those whose apps were rejected for the same function, but my point is that they shouldn't have rejected those apps at all. It's hypocritical of them to reject an app for a reason, and then when they get desperate for their iAd program to catch on more with advertisers (which apparently aren't as excited for the platform as Apple had hoped) they change their mind and create their own app.

    And besides, an ad impression is an ad impression. The only iAds that I click on are accidental. If people want to download an app to see what an iAd looks like, they are also getting the best of what the advertisers had hoped for: the chance to make somebody want to use their product. They pay for the option of changing somebody's mind, not to actually do it. They pay to put the advertisement in partial view. Not to actually sell products directly.

    It doesn't matter who makes the app, if they are putting the ads in front of people, they deserve the money. That goes for Apple or any of the several individuals that have already created such apps.

    With respect, you clearly don't work in advertising. You pay to put ads in front of the right people, not just anyone. Especially not competing advertisers and agencies. Why do you think Google (a) makes so much advertising revenue and (b) collects so much data about its users? Coincidence?

    Secondly individuals are just as greedy as corporations, and generally get to operate outside of the spotlight. Apple has a lot to lose if its iAd platform is seen to be poorly targeting users, but an App developer has a lot to gain from indiscriminate iAd spamming. So in this case, yes, for the sake of self interest I'd expect Apple to reimburse advertisers for clicks inside their iAd app, and I'd expect an independent developer of a similar app to laugh all the way to the bank.

    I never said btw I'd expect Apple to reimburse developers for their time on rejected apps. Or if I did I didn't mean it.



    more...


    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. charles theron hairstyle 2011
  • charles theron hairstyle 2011



  • iBug2
    Apr 30, 06:48 PM
    Is there? They're already controlling what can and cannot be sold on the iOS platform (and it is an entire platform now with full-fledged computers in the form of the iPad). They've proven themselves beyond contempt by insisting that in-app subscriptions be the same or lower on the App store than direct, despite the fact that they demand 1/3 of all the selling price. They've added an 'App' store for OSX proper and have the same 30% "grab" for everything on there. They're advertising and bragging about bringing iOS features back to OSX. I'm just doing simple math here. You can make 1+1 = 1 if you say it's a bigger one, but in my world, 2 is still the more likely answer.

    And you are the ones using the words "foolish". I think it's quite possibly a business-savvy solution to ensuring profits stay high into the future. What you or I may want in OSX is irrelevant to both Apple and Steve Jobs. Steve has essentially said that consumers don't know what's best for them and that it takes a visionary to move forward. We know Steve's 'vision' is smaller/thinner/more mobile at almost any cost. So I'm not saying it will happen like that, but that it's looking more likely every day. Only time will tell for sure. But I know if it does happen, I'll no longer have an interest in OSX. I don't want Apple deciding for me what I can or cannot buy or watching developers get 1/3 their gross taken from them (same % as a typical injury lawyer BTW. You don't get paid until they get paid FIRST and your bills 2nd and you last; in this case it would be taxes instead of bills). You can think it's good/fair/right. I don't agree and I don't want Apple telling me I have to use Safari because they don't want Firefox or Chrome competing with them.



    I don't know about that. There will always be a market for faster/more powerful (i.e. most people may drive a Ford Focus or Chevy Impala or Toyota Corrola and hybrids may capture larger and larger market penetration in the future, but that doesn't mean there isn't a market for the WRX, Mustang, Corvette, etc. even if it shrinks over time) and so even if Apple AND Microsoft bail out of traditional computing, that just means someone else will likely take over. They can't make Linux go away, for example. And if people didn't BUY it, the lines would stop. Newton didn't exactly go over so well the first time around....

    Remember what Steve said. PC's as we use today will be like trucks. Yes they will be around but nobody, not you nor me are going to use them.

    And no. Are you currently using a 64 core workstation? I bet not. But they are available. So no, we don't need the fastest even today. In 15 years, an iPad will be more powerful than our 12 core Mac Pro's. And nobody will pick anything up. All computer industry will go post pc devices, because it makes much more sense. They are much easier to use, we hate them now because we can use actual PC's, but most of the population can't. Not just old people, most of the young people have tons of issues with regular PC's as well.

    And don't worry, we won't be too down about it when it finally happens, since it'll happen very slowly.

    Like I said, that's not even the weird part. We won't even have CPU's in our computers, just inputs. :)





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • iGary
    Sep 25, 09:44 PM
    I have an experiment for those that say "My car runs fine on Chevron gas."

    1. Use parking break.

    2. Try accellerating to freeway speeds.

    Report back when done.


    Seriously, you realize that the "straightening tool" is not a free-form rotation tool, right? It's optimized for 1-10 degree straightenings, not flipping the picture around.

    That having been said, yes, straightening is maddeningly slow on G5s (also on iPhoto ... I have dual 2.0 G5s, and fullscreen or even windowed straightening stutters all over the place). They've got an algorithm problem there (or, more likely, an algorithm which doesn't check for a "break" often enough, which makes it unresponsive and seem really slow). But, the test for that isn't doing a 180-degree rotation on an image; the test is trying to get a correct 1.25 degree rotation when the tools seem to be fighting with you.

    The key is this: they could fix the tool to work perfectly for straightening, and still flipping the image around 180 degrees would be slow as molasses to render. Which is just fine, because the 90-degree rotate works fast as can be.

    I'd answer this, but you know, I'm tired of fighting sarcasm.



    more...


    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • ct2k7
    Apr 23, 06:29 PM
    In which case nearly *all* your personal data is vulnerable. Cell tower tracking is not a special case, and relatively not especially more dangerous or compromising than anything else you've got stored on your computer.

    Again, there's no egregious violation taking place here, and it's not especially worse than any other way to keep tabs on someone.

    I'd rather have a stalker than a paedophile on me.


    Let's reserve the lynching for when we actually find out what this tracking data is for specifically and how widespread the issue is with other companies (i.e., Google, MS, etc.)

    Ok


    If there is no actual cause for concern to the average person (which there really isn't), I fail to see that need to take a flip over it.

    You really didn't say that... did you?


    Anyway, that's all Il'll post about this for now. I really don't have a lot more to say. This topic is already way off-course, mostly my fault.


    ok





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • AidenShaw
    Nov 16, 10:34 PM
    Capacitator? That must be some fancy new kind of capacitor... sweet!

    It's the Brit pronunciation - like that extra syllable that they throw into aluminum...



    more...


    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. Image bank of UPDO HAIRSTYLES
  • Image bank of UPDO HAIRSTYLES



  • kgtenacious
    May 2, 03:52 PM
    Are we merely targets for advertising, or are we human?

    Yes.





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011



  • Truffy
    Mar 25, 10:46 AM
    They will either merge iOS and OS X into something new or they will simply drop OS X altogether in favor of iOS. Since iOS is much more successful than OS X ever was and since it is getting more and more features
    Excuse my ignorance, but does an OS that runs lil' apps on a poxy hand-held computer scale up to run full-blown applications (think FCS) on a multi-core, heavy-hardware computer?





    prom updo hairstyles 2011 for short. prom updo hairstyles 2011 for
  • prom updo hairstyles 2011 for



  • steve_hill4
    Aug 10, 04:07 PM
    To be honest, the only things putting me off a future purchase of an ACD are connectors, possible incompatibility and cost. If they were a little more affordable for me, (as they are sure to be by the time I think of a purchase), I would get one of the 23" models. However, I would be planning on using it as a display for my PC which also doubled as a second display for my iMac and MBP. Therefore I would need ideally either one VGA and one DVI, two DVI and a VGA or a pair of DVIs. It just wouldn't be practical switching back and forth all the time for me.





    Edge100
    Oct 23, 12:26 PM
    New investments in technologies and products would be by far the best use of the money. With Apple's cash, they could set up a research arm similar to Xerox PARC or the old Bell Labs and place themselves in the forefront of new technology for a long time. Instead, they seem to be notably stingy with their R&D dollars. Purchasing technologies by buying out smaller companies could also be advantageous, and Apple does do some of this, but not much -- not enough to make even a dent in their cash hoard.

    I'm not so sure that Apple needs to re-invent the wheel all the time. It seems to me that Apple is (historically) pretty good at introducing new features, long before other PC manufacturers.

    While I agree that a dedicated research arm could, in the long term, create a lot of great, innovative products and technologies, I think they have the possibility, if not properly run, to become cash cows that produce little or nothing of any profit-making value. Researchers have a way of remaining focused on research, not profits.

    I still think that buying up other small, but influential companies such as Digidesign would be a great thing for Apple. Think of all the products that Apple currently sells that were bought, rather than developed in-house:

    iTunes
    Final Cut Pro
    Shake
    Logic (and, by extension, Garageband)
    LiveType

    Heck, even MacOS X was, in many ways, 'bought' rather than developed by Apple.





    rorschach
    Apr 15, 02:16 PM
    Hm.

    These seem like something that everyone here says can't be real, "no way Apple would design something like that," the "perspective is all off" ... and then end up being real after all.

    Remember the screenshots of the Fat Nano ad file in Photoshop?





    luminosity
    Oct 3, 12:17 PM
    i guess the countdown starts about now :).

    hard to believe its been nine months since macworld 2006.





    ademuth93
    Jul 22, 04:05 PM
    Untrue. The iPhone is the only phone affected this way.

    I laughed at this.

    So you mean to say that holding any other phone will never change the reception at all? HA!! Have you read your cell phone's user guide? On one of the first pages they have a diagram of how to hold the phone so as not to lose as much reception. Get a life, and stop calling me fanboy (assuming you're one of "those" people) because I can enjoy a perfectly usable phone more than you can.





    elppa
    Apr 29, 04:01 PM
    I like it as it is in Snow Leopard.

    If Apple listened to all the “I like it as it” people we would still be on platinum. :)
    Doesn't hurt to change things every now and then.

    I wonder if this was in response to actual user feedback, or if Steve just decided one day…



    No comments:

    Post a Comment